Ranking

Austria’s Best Employers 2026

For the tenth time, the Austria's Top Employers 2026 ranking awards the 300 top companies to work for in Austria, based on a survey of over 8,000 employees, in cooperation with the business magazine trend, Xing, and kununu.

  • Based on a clear and detailed methodology
  • Segmented industry
  • Created in cooperation with trend
  • > 1400

    companies rated

  • 8000

    employees surveyed

  • 300

    companies awarded

AWARDING YOUR EXCELLENCE

Claim your award

Every awardee is contacted by email with instructions on accessing the award portal.

Not sure if you have received this information? Contact us.

Golden star-shaped trophy symbolizing achievement and excellence, displayed on a gold base.

Project Details

About the project

Scoring

Identifying the top companies to work for in Austria

Our scoring model is based on independently collected survey data from employees in Austria. The data is divided into several assessment dimensions.

Direct score

On a scale of 0 to 10, respondents indicated how likely they were to recommend their own employer to friends or family – with 0 being the least likely and 10 being the most.

Indirect score

Respondents indicated the industry they work in. Based on this, each respondent is shown a selection of employers who are active in the given sector. Respondents can then voluntarily recommend or advise against employers from the list.

METHODOLOGY

How we work

Learn about our general approach to creating employer rankings. Further details about how the ranking was created can be found in the Austria’s Best Employers 2026 methodology.

01 Concept

For our employment projects, we evaluate and rank the world’s leading employers, highlighting organizations that excel in fostering positive work environments and sustainable growth. Our rankings help job seekers make informed career choices while providing companies with a benchmark to assess their standing in the global job market. 

02 Data Collection

For data collection, our team of analysts creates detailed online questionnaires that ask survey participants about work-related topics. By working with leading online access panels worldwide, suitable participants are identified and surveyed independently of potentially awarded employer brands. Survey responses are then checked for quality and validity (interview length, variances, inconsistencies) and sorted accordingly. 

03 Evaluation

To evaluate the data, we apply a scoring model that combines direct feedback on the participants’ own employers with indirect feedback on other employers within their professional fields.  

04 Quality Assurance

For each potential award-winning employer, company information is researched and eligibility for the list is confirmed. This step serves as quality assurance and is presented as information in the publication.

Partnership

Our media partner

trend offers up to date, to the point economic stories, in-depth analyses and opinions of prominent guest authors as well as competent tips for money, career and leisure time. The claim „Wir bewegen Wirtschaft“ (“We move the economy”) is at the same time the guiding principle behind the magazine’s content. trend promotes entrepreneurial risk and motivation and stands against excessive bureaucracy, burdens and obstacles.

trend logo.

FAQ 

Frequently asked questions 

Find the answers to the most frequently asked questions below.

Have questions?

Get in touch with us

You can contact us via the phone number or email below for any queries related to this project. We look forward to hearing from you.

Svenja Lorenc.
DE

CONTACT FORM

Send us a message

Fill out the contact form and we will get back to you shortly.

Contact form fields

Disclaimer - The rankings presented here include only institutions within the defined scope of the respective project. An institution’s inclusion in the ranking reflects positive recognition according to the applied methodology and the data available at the time of compilation. The results reflect the status at the time of data collection and are therefore time-bound. The rankings are not intended to serve as the sole basis for decision-making, and any reliance is at the user’s own risk. They should be considered alongside other sources and, where appropriate, independently verified. No representation is made, and no inference shall be drawn, regarding the quality of institutions not included in the rankings.