Ranking
World's Best Hospitals & Clinics for Medical Tourism 2027
The World's Best Hospitals & Clinics for Medical Tourism 2027 awards the top 295 hospitals and clinics across 13 countries for their excellence in serving international patients. The ranking was based on an extensive evaluation of facilities serving medical tourists, combining expert recommendations, accreditations, patient experience data, international patient services, and insights from the Statista Medical Tourism Facility Survey.
- Based on a clear and detailed methodology
- Segmented by country and specialty
- Created in partnership with Newsweek
Ranking Details
World's Best Hospitals & Clinics for Medical Tourism 2027
The hospitals in the table below have been awarded the “The World's Best Hospitals & Clinics for Medical Tourism 2027” award by Statista and Newsweek.
Total:
Total hospitals and clinics:
0 hospitals and clinics
- airplanes
≥80th percentile in overall performance and peer recommendations.
- airplanes
≥55th and <80th percentile in overall performance or peer recommendations.
- airplanes
All remaining ranked hospitals and clinics.
AWARDING YOUR EXCELLENCE
Claim your award
Every awardee is contacted by email with instructions on accessing the award portal.
Not sure if you have received this information? Contact us.
Project Details
About the project
Published for the first time in 2027, the World's Best Hospitals & Clinics for Medical Tourism 2027 ranking was based on a comprehensive evaluation of hospitals and clinics serving international patients across 13 major medical tourism destinations: Brazil, Germany, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Thailand, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, and the United States.
Medical tourism refers to cross-border travel for planned inpatient or outpatient medical treatment. We evaluated eligible facilities separately within each relevant specialty, disease, or procedure area. More than 25,000 hospitals worldwide were included in the overarching analysis.
Our evaluation combined five pillars: recommendations from medical professionals and medical tourism facilitators; relevant accreditations and certifications; patient-review and social-listening data; international patient services and support; and insights from the Statista Medical Tourism Facility Survey.
The final ranking includes 1,025 ranked entries across nine specialty-, disease-, and procedure-specific lists, representing 295 unique hospitals and clinics. Facilities with expertise in multiple areas could be recognized in more than one list. Categories include bariatric surgery; cardiac care and cardiac surgery; orthopedics; ophthalmology; breast cancer; prostate cancer; breast augmentation; liposuction; and rhinoplasty.
METHODOLOGY
How we work
Learn about our general approach to creating healthcare rankings. Further details about how the ranking was created can be found in the World's Best Hospitals & Clinics for Medical Tourism 2027.
01 Concept
For our healthcare projects, we provide comprehensive insights into the quality of healthcare providers and facilities through our rankings. These rankings help patients make informed, data-driven decisions about their medical needs. They also give healthcare facilities a composite benchmark to understand their position relative to their peers. Integrating data from diverse performance indicators and expert knowledge, we deliver rankings that recognize excellence and promote high standards in healthcare.
02 Data Collection
Our team of analysts employs a range of data sources including questionnaires collecting insights from professionals and data submitted directly by hospitals through the Statista PROMs Implementation and Smart Hospitals Maturity surveys. Publicly available data on quality metrics and patient experience are also assessed. In collaboration with a global board of experts, we are continuously advancing our methodologies to compile the most trusted healthcare rankings.
03 Evaluation
Healthcare analysts at Statista Rankings apply advanced scoring models comprising numerous data pillars to ensure robust and reliable results. Evaluation relies largely on diverse quality indicators and survey results, with pillar weightings adjusted per project based on data availability. These tailored models are used to calculate scores for each facility and determine the final rankings.
04 Quality Assurance
As we are committed to quality, every ranking undergoes a thorough verification process to validate the data used and ensure that the top healthcare providers are recognized. Our experienced team of analysts conducts extensive research on a range of healthcare topics and facilities—including hospitals, nursing homes, and doctors—guaranteeing the utmost reliability in Statista's rankings.
Partnership
Our media partner
Newsweek is an American news magazine and website that provides high-quality information to readers around the globe, reaching over 75 million people each month. First launched in 1933, Newsweek nowadays reports on topics in the fields of international issues, technology, business, culture and politics. The information channels range from weekly published print editions in various countries to an online and mobile presence worldwide.
SURVEY REGISTRATION
Participate in peer‑to‑peer surveys
If you are a healthcare professional and want to be part of future rounds of our peer-to-peer surveys, feel free to pre-register here.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Find the answers to the most frequently asked questions below.
Have questions?
Get in touch with us
You can contact us via the phone number or email below for any queries related to this project. We look forward to hearing from you.
Matt Green
Sales Manager
Matt Green
Sales Manager
CONTACT FORM
Send us a message
Fill out the contact form and we will get back to you shortly.
Disclaimer - The rankings presented here include only institutions within the defined scope of the respective project. An institution’s inclusion in the ranking reflects positive recognition according to the applied methodology and the data available at the time of compilation. The results reflect the status at the time of data collection and are therefore time-bound. The rankings are not intended to serve as the sole basis for decision-making, and any reliance is at the user’s own risk. They should be considered alongside other sources and, where appropriate, independently verified. No representation is made, and no inference shall be drawn, regarding the quality of institutions not included in the rankings.